๐ŸŽฏ Purpose

The Urban Sustainability Assessment System is developed for the project: "Development of an AI-Based Smart Sustainability Assessment System for Urban Infrastructure Management."


This system provides an intelligent, data-driven approach to evaluating the sustainability of urban infrastructure by analysing key environmental, social, governance, and economic parameters and generating actionable planning recommendations.

๐Ÿ“ ESGEc Sustainability Parameters

The ESGEc Sustainability Assessment model evaluates urban sustainability using four key dimensions: Environmental, Social, Governance, and Economic. Each dimension contains specific indicators representing the physical, social, institutional, and financial conditions of urban infrastructure systems.

๐ŸŒ
Environmental (E)
Dimension weight: 0.35

Evaluates ecological and physical conditions affecting environmental resilience and urban flood performance, including precipitation exposure, surface permeability, drainage capacity, and land use patterns.

๐ŸŒง๏ธ
Rainfall Intensity โ€” Measures precipitation impact on urban drainage capacity and flood risk. Cost
๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ
Impervious Surface โ€” Represents the percentage of surfaces that prevent natural water infiltration. Cost
๐Ÿ’ง
Drainage Condition โ€” Evaluates the ability of drainage infrastructure to manage runoff effectively. Benefit
๐ŸŒฟ
Land Use Sustainability โ€” Assesses whether land use patterns support ecological balance and environmental resilience. Benefit
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Social (S)
Dimension weight: 0.20

Evaluates how infrastructure supports people, access, and community wellbeing. Reflects the degree to which infrastructure design serves social equity, inclusivity, and public livability.

๐Ÿšถ
Accessibility โ€” Measures ease of access to transport, services, and public amenities. Benefit
๐Ÿ˜๏ธ
Community Facilities โ€” Evaluates the availability of schools, clinics, parks, and community services. Benefit
โš–๏ธ
Governance (G)
Dimension weight: 0.20

Evaluates management quality and institutional capacity for sustainable infrastructure delivery. Strong governance enables effective planning, regulation, and long-term maintenance.

๐Ÿ”ง
Maintenance Efficiency โ€” Measures how effectively infrastructure assets are maintained over time. Benefit
๐Ÿ“‹
Policy Support โ€” Evaluates the strength of planning policies, regulations, and institutional support. Benefit
๐Ÿ’น
Economic (Ec)
Dimension weight: 0.25

Evaluates financial sustainability and infrastructure cost efficiency, including resource utilisation during development and the long-term affordability of operational maintenance.

๐Ÿ’ผ
Development Cost Efficiency โ€” Measures how efficiently financial resources are utilised during infrastructure development. Benefit
๐Ÿ’ฐ
Maintenance Cost โ€” Represents the long-term operational cost burden required for infrastructure maintenance. Cost

๐Ÿค– AI-Assisted Evaluation

The system employs an AI-driven scoring model that analyses each indicator against established sustainability benchmarks. Individual indicator scores are normalised, weighted, and aggregated into dimension scores, which are then combined into a comprehensive Sustainability Index classified into five sustainability levels.


Based on the assessment results, the AI recommendation engine generates targeted, context-aware suggestions for improving urban infrastructure sustainability across all four ESGEc dimensions.

๐ŸŒ Supporting Urban Planning

This prototype demonstrates how AI-powered assessment tools can support:

  • Evidence-based urban sustainability planning and decision-making
  • Identification of critical vulnerabilities in urban infrastructure across environmental, social, governance, and economic dimensions
  • Prioritisation of sustainability interventions based on data-driven analysis
  • Scenario testing to evaluate the impact of policy, drainage, and land use changes
  • Integration of smart technology in sustainable urban infrastructure management

๐Ÿท๏ธ Indicator Types

Each indicator in the ESGEc model is classified as either a Benefit Indicator or a Cost Indicator, reflecting the direction in which changes affect sustainability performance.

Benefit Benefit Indicator

A benefit indicator is a variable where higher values improve sustainability performance. Increasing a benefit indicator contributes positively to the overall Sustainability Index.

Examples in this model:

  • ๐Ÿ’ง Drainage Condition
  • ๐ŸŒฟ Land Use Sustainability
  • ๐Ÿšถ Accessibility
  • ๐Ÿ˜๏ธ Community Facilities
  • ๐Ÿ”ง Maintenance Efficiency
  • ๐Ÿ“‹ Policy Support
  • ๐Ÿ’ผ Development Cost Efficiency
Cost Cost Indicator

A cost indicator is a variable where higher values reduce sustainability performance. Increasing a cost indicator negatively affects the overall Sustainability Index.

Examples in this model:

  • ๐ŸŒง๏ธ Rainfall Intensity
  • ๐Ÿ›ค๏ธ Impervious Surface
  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ Maintenance Cost

๐Ÿ“ Normalisation Method

Because the indicators use different units and scales, the system converts each raw indicator value into a common scale between 0 and 1 before aggregation. This ensures fair and consistent comparison across all indicators regardless of their original measurement units.

Benefit Benefit Indicator Formula
Normalised Score = (x โˆ’ min) / (max โˆ’ min)

Higher raw values โ†’ higher normalised score โ†’ better sustainability.

Cost Cost Indicator Formula
Normalised Score = (max โˆ’ x) / (max โˆ’ min)

Higher raw values โ†’ lower normalised score โ†’ weaker sustainability.

๐Ÿ“

This normalisation approach ensures fair comparison across indicators with different units and directions, producing dimension scores that are directly comparable and combinable into the overall Sustainability Index.

๐Ÿ“Š What is the Sustainability Index?

The Sustainability Index (SI) is a composite score representing the overall sustainability performance of the assessed urban system. It integrates normalised, weighted indicator scores from the four ESGEc dimensions into a single interpretable value ranging from 0 to 1.


Each dimension is calculated from its respective indicators using a weighted aggregation formula. The four dimension scores are then combined into the final Sustainability Index using dimension-level weights derived from the ESGEc research framework:

Overall Sustainability Index
SI = 0.35ยทE + 0.20ยทS + 0.20ยทG + 0.25ยทEc

Higher values indicate stronger sustainability performance. Lower values indicate weaker sustainability conditions requiring targeted planning intervention.


Interpretation Categories:

0.81 โ€“ 1.00 Very High Sustainability
0.61 โ€“ 0.80 High Sustainability
0.41 โ€“ 0.60 Moderate Sustainability
0.21 โ€“ 0.40 Low Sustainability
0.00 โ€“ 0.20 Very Low Sustainability

This framework supports urban planners, researchers, and decision-makers in evaluating infrastructure sustainability and testing improvement scenarios through interventions such as drainage upgrades, policy reform, and green infrastructure investment.

AI-Based Smart Sustainability Assessment

Created by Nur Fitriah Isa